NDepend Blog

Improve your .NET code quality with NDepend

1999 - Ti I Ja Mozemo Sve [cd Flac].rar < Official >

View credits, reviews, tracks and shop for the 1999 Cassette release of "Ti I Ja Možemo Sve" on Discogs. Luna – Ti I Ja Možemo Sve | Releases - Discogs

Recorded at Studio Sky and mastered at Studio O in Belgrade Experience the title track from the original 1999 release: Luna - Ti i ja možemo sve - (audio) - 1999 City Records Grupa Luna YouTube• Sep 12, 2012 1999 - Ti I Ja Mozemo Sve [CD FLAC].rar

🚀 Are you looking for similar Europop albums from the late 90s, or do you need help identifying other guest artists who worked with the group Luna? Luna – Ti I Ja Možemo Sve - Discogs View credits, reviews, tracks and shop for the

The album features high-energy production typical of the era, blending acoustic and electric guitars with synth-driven arrangements. It is notable for its collaborations, including a guest vocal appearance by Serbian superstar on the track "Drugarice". 🎼 Tracklist It is notable for its collaborations, including a

The standard CD release contains 16 tracks with a total runtime of approximately 1 hour and 2 minutes. Da Me Ljubiš Noćima Neka Je Ti Si Moj Promašaj Lagaće Usne Tebe Nema Miriše Juli Ti I Ja Možemo Sve (Title Track) 1000 Na Čas Oči Neverne Drugarice (feat. Ceca) Zeleno Nosi Od Mene Sve Kako Da Priznam Nebo Zna Samo Jednu Noć 🛠️ Production Credits

Boris Nikolić (Acoustic), Mile Novković (Electric) Mixing/Engineering: Boris Gavrilović, Vlada Negovanović

Comments:

  1. Ivar says:

    %!s(int=2026) © %!d(string=Clear Echo)

    I can imagine it took quite a while to figure it out.

    I’m looking forward to play with the new .net 5/6 build of NDepend. I guess that also took quite some testing to make sure everything was right.

    I understand the reasons to pick .net reactor. The UI is indeed very understandable. There are a few things I don’t like about it but in general it’s a good choice.

    Thanks for sharing your experience.

  2. David Gerding says:

    Nice write-up and much appreciated.

  3. Very good article. I was questioning myself a lot about the use of obfuscators and have also tried out some of the mentioned, but at the company we don’t use one in the end…

    What I am asking myself is when I publish my .net file to singel file, ready to run with an fixed runtime identifer I’ll get sort of binary code.
    At first glance I cannot dissasemble and reconstruct any code from it.
    What do you think, do I still need an obfuscator for this szenario?

    1. > when I publish my .net file to singel file, ready to run with an fixed runtime identifer I’ll get sort of binary code.

      Do you mean that you are using .NET Ahead Of Time compilation (AOT)? as explained here:
      https://blog.ndepend.com/net-native-aot-explained/

      In that case the code is much less decompilable (since there is no more IL Intermediate Language code). But a motivated hacker can still decompile it and see how the code works. However Obfuscator presented here are not concerned with this scenario.

  4. OK. After some thinking and updating my ILSpy to the latest version I found out that ILpy can diassemble and show all sources of an “publish single file” application. (DnSpy can’t by the way…)
    So there IS definitifely still the need to obfuscate….

Comments are closed.